Category Archives: Environment

Quick responses to the usual GW skeptic talking points

“So much snow, how can this be global warming!?”
The world is bigger than your back garden, you know.

“It was such a long and cold winter two years ago, how can there be such a thing as global warming?!”
For the same reason that a drizzle of snow into April does not mean that summer’s cancelled.

“Scientists are only doing it for the money.”
Even in the decades before there was any significant political or media attention about the global climate?

Oh, yeah, those postdocs are /really/ living the sweet life with fat paycheques they get from their plentiful for research grants on their desks year in and year out!

“Climate and environment and all that stuff is only something lefties talk about.”
That’s because ‘lefties’ are the only ones who give a damn when scientists have something of concern to say.

“Green energy schemes and such just makes us poorer.”
The same way that sandbagging your house does when the levee is about to break? Sandbags are expensive, you know.

“Curtailing carbon energy use will crash the economy!”
Right, because a, say 0.5% short-term drop in GNP growth will spell permanent doom for society.

“Ending coal use causes unemployment!”

As if employment in a danky coal mine is just dandy. Miners lung and tunnel collapses are after all just is something that comes with the job, and better stick with the devil you know, right?

Yeah, okay. And mountaintop removal also gives the wife and kids the sorely needed food supplements since foodstuffs are generally deficient in lead and mercury. We don’t want to rob you of those benefits either, do we? Fecking environmentalists.

“I know that it’s all a hoax! I can prove it, I have years of expertise in <this or that field of engineering>”.

Then why the damn are you spending your time in this debate forum then when you could be out there harvesting fame and Nobel prizes left and right? Oh, wait.

“Climate is chaotic and can’t be modelled. So all these models are just bunk and useless!”

The movement of water molecules in a pot of boiling water on your stove is also chaotic, yet that doesn’t mean that you won’t be certain to scald your hand by plunging it into it.

“Government should stay out of this!”

Right, because all private economic decision makers that operates on a for-profit basis will spontaneously and cooperatively can be trsuted to act in the best interest of the global society and curtail their use of carbon fuels.

“There isn’t a problem, you or the goverment have nothing to do in this regard.”

Keep saying that when I’m opening up a landfill in front of your house. You got a problem with that? Tough.

“NASA just can’t be trusted.”

You have an alternative source of data and analysis of this data, then? If that is the case, why should we trust them with anything?

 

“You don’t get to take my money!”

I don’t give a feck about your money. Spend it on whatever you like. But DO care about what eventually happens  when you put to use whatever you buy with your money.

Buy yourself a buzzsaw, tear down the old pines in the back of the garden and have yourself a good time with the buddies. Lovely. Fine with me. But when you throw on some old tires on just for the hell of it, with me living right next door and having a garden party as well, then it’s not fine with me anymore.

I don’t care about you buying plenty of bourbon, but I DO care if you go on a merry drive in the city after having a generous sample of it.

Buy all the guns and ammo that you’d like and get to it at the firing range; I haven’t a care. In fact, that’s great! But the day your rounds start land on my grounds, then I start caring – a lot.

 

You get the point.  You got it before you read this far. Its likely that you even got it before you came to read this.

 

So, if you come up on a bunch of guys pissing in the big swimming pool where everyone else are spending their time, do you call them out on it* or tell yourself “nah, its probably lemonade”?

*) I was about to add “…and tell them to piss off”, but I caught myself.

Link

http://footprint.wwf.org.uk/

An informative indicator of the environmental burden your personal resource use.

Disable cookies, fx. with Privacy Badger to be able to retake it to play around with what weights in the most.

CC news #1

Twenty-two world-leading marine scientists have collaborated in the synthesis report in a special section of Science journal. They say the oceans are at parlous [sic] risk from the combination of threats related to CO2. They believe politicians trying to solve climate change have paid far too little attention to the impacts of climate change on the oceans.

It is clear, they say, that CO2 from burning fossil fuels is changing the chemistry of the seas faster than at any time since a cataclysmic natural event known as the Great Dying 250 million years ago.

They warn that the ocean has absorbed nearly 30% of the carbon dioxide we have produced since 1750 and, as CO2 is a mildly acidic gas, it is making seawater more acidic. It has also buffered climate change by absorbing over 90% of the additional heat created by industrial society since 1970. The extra heat makes it harder for the ocean to hold oxygen. (This is where the ‘missing heat’ that CC skeptics constantly complain about has gone – there was never a warming hiatus – there just weren’t looking, if looking at all.)

…They warn that the carbon we emit today may change the earth system irreversibly for many generations to come.

It is a certainty, not a possibility.

The marine food source (and sustainability in itself) is being shredded, and with it the the societies and communities that depend on it on this globe.

http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-33369024

 

 

About those Teslas…

Surely you have heard about the Tesla company and its cars. Of course. Sleek and streamlined on the exterior, luxurious and highly comfortable on the inside. You’d want one!

Oh, and it’s not gasoline-powered; instead it uses electricity from a large battery pack. It doesn’t contribute to the smog of the cities or the general CO2 emissions. Sweet!

Only, of course it contributes to CO2 emissions and general air pollution when the source of the electrical energy is not renewable or nuclear. However, in a  world where renewables are becoming more and more commonplace, this will be less of a concern.

I have a quibble, however. It is that, while the battery allows pollution-less operation, it is also very heavy: In fact it weighs in at around 1000 kg for the top 85 kWH battery pack. Most smaller cars weigh that, or less than that.

The operating weight of a Tesla S is 2000-2250 kg, while that of, say a FIAT 500 (2007 model) is just about 1000 kg. This 1-tonne battery pack is mass that needs to be towed around – it needs energy to be accelerated and it causes additional rolling resistance. (The  biggest force acting on the car at high speeds is the air resistance, which is mitigated somewhat by the streamlined frame – bu at low speeds this does nothing to help the Tesla, as it is the rolling friction that is the biggest energy leech).

Thus, yes’ it’s a clean and bloody desirable piece of equipment, but for it to be significantly better than any gasoline powered car, energy must become much more plentiful than it is today. (Hint: Nuclear.).

I do look forward to Graphene capacitors/batteries become reality and enter the consumer market, which will eliminate the problem of added weight from energy storage systems.

 

Feb2013 news snippets

Economics of Extinction; the Bluefin Tuna:

http://science.time.com/2013/01/11/the-pacific-bluefin-tuna-is-almost-gone/

It wasn’t an easy number to find. Earlier this week the International Scientific Committee for Tuna and Tuna-like Species in the North Pacific Ocean—seriously, that’s the name—released the latest assessment (PDF) of the Pacific bluefin tuna population. The bluefin tuna is the tiger of the sea—in more ways than one. It’s a top of the food chain predator that can grow to over 1,000 lbs. and swim at speeds above 50 mph. In captivity—you can see them at the great Monterey Bay Aquarium in northern California—they shimmer like sports cars. Unfortunately for the tuna, they also happen to be delicious—the flesh of the bluefin tuna is prized by sushi chefs in the high-end restaurants of Japan. Just last week, a 489-lb. bluefin was sold at a fish auction in Tokyo for a record $1.76 million—or about $3,600 per pound.

So it’s not surprising that the Pacific bluefin tuna—as well as its cousins in the Atlantic—are the subject of single-minded hunts by fishermen wherever they are found. But it’s always been difficult to determine just how rapidly the bluefin is being fished out—in part, possibly, because countries like Japan that do most of the fishing and most of the consumption of bluefin don’t really want those numbers made public. It’s a strategy that should be familiar from a lot of environmental policy battles.

But back to that scientific report. Buried deep in the highly technical language of the Pacific Bluefin Tuna Stock Assessment is a number: 0.036. That’s the depletion ratio for one of the computer simulation runs done that tries to model the effect of fishing on the bluefin tuna population. By itself, 0.036 doesn’t seem to mean much—unless you do some more math. In the simulations, the number 1 represents the estimated population of the bluefin tuna before we started fishing. 0.036 is what’s left now. Convert that to a percentage, and you get 96.4%. Which means that by the best guesses of scientists, the Pacific bluefin tuna population has declined by 96.4% since we began fishing it decades ago. 96.4%. No wonder that bluefin sold in Tokyo was so valuable. There may not be many fish left in the sea.

 

Mackarel fish stocks mismanagement:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/jan/22/fishy-tale-of-mackerel-mismanagement

It was ironic that I got the call that the Marine Conservation Society , had downgraded mackerel from its “eat with a happy heart” list, to “eat with caution”, as I was putting a tin of mackerel into my shopping basket. Just last week, we were told that mackerel was plentiful and good for us. But, although this is news that hits and confuses consumers now, it’s actually a story that started some years before.

First, let me tell you that the mackerel in question is from north-east Atlantic stocks (an area from Gibraltar to Russia). It is not endangered. Not yet. The scientists at the International Council for the Exploration of the Sea (ICES) are the ones that look at fish stocks and make recommendations as to what are the limits of any fish caught . This limit changes every year, is decided in December and becomes part of the common fisheries policy (CFP) which governs EU fisheries. These fishing quotas are reported in the press but most consumers quite understandably glaze over them. But if you had read the reports, you’d have seen that something was going on with mackerel.

What the ICES has said about mackerel is that its spawning stock biomass is currently at about 2.7 million tonnes. The safe biological figure is 2.3 million tonnes and it’s not expected to fall below that figure at “current exploitation levels” until 2014; but that’s only next year – hence why fish conservation organisations are concerned now. So the spawning biomass is currently above the levels required for a healthy stock, but, it’s declining and there is a downward trend.

It’s a sad story. Until recently mackerel fishing was well managed. The EU and Norway (which has allied itself closely with the EU in fishery terms) had a 90% quota of the total mackerel quota; the remaining 10% went to Iceland and the Faroe Islands. Until 2008, there were almost no catches reported in the Icelandic and Faroese waters, because there just weren’t that many mackerel in the water to catch. But, in recent years, the mackerel have started to migrate, due to a myriad of factors such as rising sea temperature and to chase their food. These other coastal states wanted more than their 10%. In 2010 they started to increase their catches from 20% to 32% of the total allowed. Since 2009, Iceland and the Faroe Islands have unilaterally agreed their own quotas, which they are legally allowed to do as they are not governed by the common fisheries policy. Their own quota is about 150,000 tonnes over and above the recommended limits.

So you see, there is currently no international agreement which governs mackerel fishing limits, although there is hope of one this year. Understandably, EU fisherman are pissed off and everyone is confused.

Tragedy of the groundwater commons (Iraq, Iran, Syria, Turkey)

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2278040/Nasa-warn-freshwater-shortages-Middle-East-study-shows-diminished-reserves.html

Vast freshwater reserves nearly equivalent in size to the Dead Sea have been lost in the Middle East in the last decade, according to a new Nasa study. Scientists warn there could be severe water shortages in decades to come if water resources are not managed better in the region. They say the precious water stocks have gone because of poor water management, increased demands for groundwater, and a major drought in 2007.

The study, which will be published later this week, examined 2003 to 2010 data from two gravity-measuring satellites which are part of Nasa’s Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment (GRACE). Scientists used GRACE satellites rather than ground-based research because of the difficulty of obtaining data on the ground in the regions covered. The satellites showed that freshwater reserves in parts of Turkey, Syria, Iraq and Iran in the Tigris and Euphrates river basins had decreased by 117m acre feet, or 144 cubic kilometres over seven years.

‘GRACE data show an alarming rate of decrease in total water storage in the Tigris and Euphrates river basins, which currently have the second fastest rate of groundwater storage loss on earth after India,’ said Jay Famiglietti, principle investigator of the study. He added: ‘Meanwhile, demand for freshwater continues to rise, and the region does not coordinate its water management because of different interpretations of international laws.’ About 60 per cent of the water went as a result of pumping underground reservoirs for ground water, including 1,000 wells in Iraq, and another 20 per cent was due to impacts of the drought including declining snow packs and soil drying up.

 

Some insight into the 1.6e9 bullets the US alphabet agencies want to acquire

http://news.yahoo.com/homeland-security-cache-bullets-190840538.html

WASHINGTON (AP) — Online rumors about a big government munitions purchase are true, sort of.

The Homeland Security Department wants to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition in the next four or five years. It says it needs them — roughly the equivalent of five bullets for every person in the United States — for law enforcement agents in training and on duty.

Published federal notices about the ammo buy have agitated conspiracy theorists since the fall. That’s when conservative radio host Alex Jones spoke of an “arms race against the American people” and said the government was “gearing up for total collapse, they’re gearing up for huge wars.”

The government’s explanation is much less sinister.

Federal solicitations to buy the bullets are known as “strategic sourcing contracts,” which help the government get a low price for a big purchase, says Peggy Dixon, spokeswoman for the Federal Law Enforcement Training Center in Glynco, Ga . The training center and others like it run by the Homeland Security Department use as many as 15 million rounds every year, mostly on shooting ranges and in training exercises.

Dixon said one of the contracts would allow Homeland Security to buy up to 750 million rounds of ammunition over the next five years for its training facilities. The rounds are used for basic and advanced law enforcement training for federal law enforcement agencies under the department’s umbrella. The facilities also offer firearms training to tens of thousands of federal law enforcement officers. More than 90 federal agencies and70,000 agents and officers used the department’s training center last year.

The rest of the 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition would be purchased by Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the federal government’s second largest criminal investigative agency.

ICE’s ammunition requests in the last year included:

—450 million rounds of .40-caliber duty ammunition

—40 million rounds of rifle ammunition a year for as many as five years, for a total bullet-buy of 200 million rounds

—176,000 rifle rounds on a separate contract

—25,000 blank rounds

The Homeland Security ammo buy is not the first time the government’s bullets purchases have sparked concerns on the Internet. The same thing happened last year when the Social Security Administration posted a notice that it was buying 174,000 hollow point bullets.

Jonathan L. Lasher, the agency’s assistant inspector general for external relations, said those bullets were for the Social Security inspector general’s office, which has about 295 agents who investigate Social Security fraud and other crimes.

Jones the talk-show host did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

Of course he (Alex Jones) didn’t. Asking him to critically asses his claims in the face of un-sinister evidence, while he is not in talk show rant mode, would let the gas out of the proverbial bag.

A real-life analogy of the social conditions in the USA:

George Costanza would have enjoyed sailing on the Carnival Triumph as passengers were left to piss in showers and shit in red plastic bags for days. It finally became socially acceptable to pee in the shower. Most of the ship’s electrical power went down after the engine room fire, causing extensive breakdowns of vital shipboard mechanical systems, including taking out sanitary systems. Passengers reported sewage sloshing around in hallways, flooded rooms and trouble getting enough to eat. Passengers waited in line for three hours to get a lousy hot dog. On the lower decks sewage came up through the shower drain, pooling in the sinks and flowing into the hallways. The allegory of the poor people on the lower decks being inundated with feces and living in wretched conditions, while the rich people living in luxury on the upper decks are blissfully ignorant of the fate of their fellow passengers is so easy to apply to our society in this day and age. The 1% glory in their stock market gains, while 20% of U.S. households are on food stamps.

After reading a number of articles describing what happened before, during and after the engine fire aboard the Carnival Triumph, the parallels between this Ship of Horrors and our Ship of State become self-evident. You have the CEO and top executives of Carnival only concerned about their wealth, power and control of the company. Rather than thinking long term and making decisions that might be detrimental to their short term quarterly earnings, but insure the long –term financial health and reputation of the company, their decision was driven by their true masters on Wall Street. Instead of taking the ship off-line to make vital repairs and  necessary investments, they just papered over signs of an imminent disaster and turned to public relations spin and propaganda as there preferred course of action. When disaster “suddenly” struck, the management and executive officers were unprepared, slow to react, and more concerned with their reputations than about the health, safety and welfare of the passengers. Much more could have been done to alleviate the misery of the 3,400 passengers.

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-02-18/guest-post-adrift-sea

What will you do the day you are forced to endure conditions such as these, if you aren’t already? Cry to the politicians? They can give you little that they haven’t taken from you already. And that’s even if they were listening to you. Mostly, they listen to the lobbyists of various, well-endowed SIGs (Special Interest Groups).

The crisis isn’t over. It’ll get worse, and in 10 years you’ll look back at these years as the start of the crash, for various reasons.

Prepare now, at least mentally.

How to be environmentally minded

…without going to join the nutjob fringe (more on that later).

* reduce your consumption of “consumer goods”

More “goods” arent necessarily good. Do they make you happy, for more than 3 days after you bought it? Think carefully about this for yourself.

I hold that it’s worse with more “goods” (I’ll call it “stuff” from now on) beyond a certain point. More stuff takes more space to keep it in. There’s a lot of packaging it comes in you have to get rid of, and a lot of packaging itself is usually wastefully ample. Then there is the trouble you have to go through if the item breaks or becomes defective during the time you own it (computer parts especially). If its an expensive item, you’ll have to deal with the bother of turning it in for repairs, waiting for it to be fixed (with the added possibility of having to have a replacement during that period), then fetching it from the store or post office etc. At some point, the item will be obsolete or simply not used; then it’ll take up space in your basement, in the back of the house, or such, until you are eventually forced to deal with it throwing it away, probably together with a lot of other crap that accumulated somewhere in your storage unit, er, house.

* What stuff you need, get it from friends, family or co-workers.

Else, buy it second hand, lots of websites from that – Ebay, Craigslist, Marktplaats.nl, DBA.dk etc.

* Bicycle rather than drive by car, where feasible.

If not seemingly feasible, make it feasible. Do the homework in regards to gettign around with bikes and public transport. If your city isn’t bike friendly, help make it so by pushing for appropirate initiatives and legislation to make it so.

It’s healthy, faster and more comfortable than walking, and you have a bare fraction of the trouble with finding parking spaces for bikes (“Velo” as the Swiss call it, with good reason). A bike is cheaper than a car. Theres little or no insurance hassle. Buy a good, sturdy lock for it for a much reduced risk of having it stolen, as well. Get saddle bags to make your bike a propre foodstuffs shopping workhorse as well.

* Sort your trash

Seperate waste in separate categories, say… organic waste (foodstuff leftovers, really), paper/cardboard, bottles, return bottles (plastics, cans etc). Having them in large or faily large bags or compartments, fx. outside your kitchen or whever practical, saves you having to dead with turning it in very often.

Use organic waste in your garden pile. Free compost!

… will be updated incrementally …

2013January news snippets

(from 5th of January, 2013:)

They call it recovery: “During fiscal year 2012, the U.S. government spent a record $80.4 billion on food stamps, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP), a $2.7 billion increase from FY 2011.”

Revolving door policy: “In July 2012, an FBI probe found that Bank of America had allowed a Mexican drug cartel to launder money through the bank. While BofA has yet to face any fines for the episode, the head of the FBI in Charlotte, N.C., BofA’s headquarters, recently left the law enforcement agency for a job at Bank of America.”

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/05/fbi-occupy-wall-street_n_2410783.html

US Government backed a False Flag atack on Syria to blame Assad: “Leaked emails have allegedly proved that the White House gave the green light to a chemical weapons attack in Syria that could be blamed on Assad’s regime and in turn, spur international military action in the devastated country. A report released on Monday contains an email exchange between two senior officials at British-based contractor Britam Defence where a scheme ‘approved by Washington’ is outlined explaining that Qatar would fund rebel forces in Syria to use chemical weapons.”

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2270219/U-S-planned-launch-chemical-weapon-attack-Syria-blame-Assad.html

 

The environmental cost – and cost to the health of the populace – from severe pollution in a China undergoing heavy industrialization is becoming evident:

No country in history has become a major industrial power without creating a legacy of environmental damage. China is clearly not an exception. The speed and scale of China’s rise has brought an unprecedented pollution problem. Public health is reeling. Pollution has made cancer China’s leading cause of death according to the Ministry of Health. Ambient air pollution alone is blamed for hundreds of thousands of deaths each year. The factories and spewing automobile engines recently caused hundreds of flights to be cancelled in and around Beijing. Stores are selling out of face masks and the government struggles to figure out this political challenge and provide relief of the long-term burden on its people. — Paula Nelson ( 47 photos total)

http://www.boston.com/bigpicture/2013/01/chinas_skies_toxic_levels_of_p.html

 

Discussions and asides:

Cynicism Redefined: Why The Copyright Lobby Loves Child Porn

“Child pornography is great,” the man said enthusiastically. “Politicians do not understand file sharing, but they understand child pornography, and they want to filter that to score points with the public. Once we get them to filter child pornography, we can get them to extend the block to file sharing.”